Tuesday, September 15, 2020

Poetaster – Wordplay Wednesday™ 09/16/2020


Forget-Me-Not Flowers for Forgotten Promise 

My apology, readers, for not following through on my pledge of September 9th’s Wordplay Wednesday that promised a follow-up word to the poesy / posy fiasco.

Please accept a posy of Forget-Me-Nots for becoming distracted last week by the “golden-ager” affront which caused me to forget to regale you with another inane poetry definition. Here ya go …

POETASTER (ʹpō-ɘ-,tas-tɘr; 1599) n. – an inferior poet. [WW #286] 

Seriously? In whose opinion? It isn’t like we follow hard-and-fast rules about anything anymore; so who’s to say what is good poetry, or who is inferior in their creation of it? The word itself is odd—is poetaster meant to imply a person who is only “tasting” the experience without any real knowledge of crafting it?
Coleridge 1772-1834 Rime of the Ancient Mariner

Worry not, budding poets, we have another dictionary term that can soften the critics’ vitriol: “poetic license.”

Like it or not, poetaster has a place in the dictionary and could fit well into your novel or nonfiction work. Perhaps in the dialogue of an odiously opinionated bard, “What gave that poetaster the idea he can create a poetic work of art?”

Or educationally exploring subjective words like poetaster, and their place in your vocabulary.
 
Word Challenge: POETASTER. In my humble opinion, anyone who takes time, meditation, and energy into putting pen to paper or fingers to keyboard with original thoughts in poetic verse, deserves better than poetaster. Create a place for a poetaster in your week of justifiable writings and clever conversations.

Learning knows no prejudices or boundaries, and it isn’t fattening! Expanding your mind is a no-cost, simple joy. Do you feel that way too? What’s your inspiration? Share your creative genius and Wordplay Wednesday comments below.

Write first for yourself … only then can you write for others. (L.Rochelle) 



[LinDee Rochelle is a writer and editor by trade, and an author by way of Rock & Roll. She has published two books in her Blast from Your Past series (of three) about pioneering R&R Radio DJs. True behind-the-mic tales make GREAT Holiday and anytime Gifts available on Amazon (eBook and print): Book 1Rock & Roll Radio DJs: The First Five Years 1954-1959; and Book 2Rock & Roll Radio DJs: The Swinging Sixties. Coming soon … The Psychedelic Seventies!]

*LR Notes: 1) Dictionary definitions are quoted from Webster’s New World College Dictionary. Yes, we sometimes present them out of “official” context—but that’s half the fun! Think of it as “creative context.” 2) a] Recent dictionary additions to definitions include a date of first use, if known; b] words in small caps indicate “see also.” 3) Neither I (LinDee Rochelle) nor Penchant for Penning are responsible for how you use information found here, that may result in legal action.

E-N-Dzzzzzzzz  

Tuesday, September 8, 2020

Golden-ager – Wordplay Wednesday™ 09/09/2020


Ol’ Gray Mare She Ain’t What She Used to Be! 

I’m not fond of the new Merriam-Webster’s format of presenting words in its print edition—too complicated for quick perusal. Add to that its attempt to shorten definitions (presumably to save space) by referring the user elsewhere in the massive tome is simply frustrating.

Their new method does injustice to many words; and omitting some former descriptive text has muddled the meanings. And then … I stumbled on a word that made it personal …

GOLDEN-AGER (gōl-dɘn-ā-jɘr; 1961) n. – an elderly and often retired person usu. engaging in club activities. [WW #285] 

Oh my, and this from a bona fide dictionary with a 2020 copyright. Golden-ager, as defined, is so many words of wrong. Obviously its meaning was 1) established in the 1960s which makes it vintage at the very least, and 2) a misnomer at best, and misconstrued meaning at worst?

Having reached that illustrious age of “retired person” (sort of), I have yet to talk with anyone who considers themselves a golden-ager in the dictionary context (or frankly, any other).

In the same dictionary, *golden age is defined as “a period of great happiness, prosperity, and achievement” without mention of age. Yet, golden-ager could come from nothing else.

Oh, we may belong to clubs and enjoy not adhering to a work schedule, but the new golden-ager’s dictionary definition is short-sighted and largely erroneous.

Somehow, the term golden age* (1555), along with golden years (1964)*, became synonymous to the age and lifestyle of the elderly. Other than spotting golden-ager in the dictionary in a hunt for interesting words, I have never heard the term. Whether retired or not, apparently, we elders are supposed to be carefree and without purpose, other than to enjoy our *golden years and join clubs.

*Golden years’ definition states, “the advanced years in a lifetime <[i.e.,] active well into their “golden years>.” That doesn’t even make sense. Setting golden years as an example doesn’t define the term, merely demonstrates its use.

Golden-ager’s 2020 definition differs from the Fifth Edition (2014), which in my humble opinion is more accurate: “[Informal] an elderly person, specif. one who is 65 or older and retired.”

*More 2020 vs. 2014 comparisons of our muddled modern dictionary terms: “Golden Age – 1) Class. Myth. the early age in which mankind was ideally happy, prosperous, and innocent; 2) a period of great progress,
prosperity, or cultural achievement; 3) of or for golden agers.” *Golden Years is not listed in the 2014 edition.

In our modern world, few retired people, especially those with moderate to low retirement funds, consider
golden-ager an apt description of their elder years. In fact, it’s demeaning and dismissive. (Definition written by someone wearing an “OK, Boomer” t-shirt?)

Word Challenge: GOLDEN-AGER. Are you there yet? If you are 55+, consider how you might improve the definition. If you’re not, give some thought to a word you think is more apropos, as you fit golden-ager into your week of contemplative writings and clever conversations.

Learning knows no prejudices or boundaries, and it isn’t fattening! Expanding your mind is a no-cost, simple joy. Do you feel that way too? What’s your inspiration? Share your creative genius and Wordplay Wednesday comments below.

Write first for yourself … only then can you write for others. (L.Rochelle) 



[LinDee Rochelle is a writer and editor by trade, and an author by way of Rock & Roll. She has published two books in her Blast from Your Past series (of three) about pioneering R&R Radio DJs. True behind-the-mic tales make GREAT Holiday and anytime Gifts available on Amazon (eBook and print): Book 1Rock & Roll Radio DJs: The First Five Years 1954-1959; and Book 2Rock & Roll Radio DJs: The Swinging Sixties. Coming soon … The Psychedelic Seventies!]

*LR Notes: 1) Dictionary definitions are quoted from Webster’s New World College Dictionary. Yes, we sometimes present them out of “official” context—but that’s half the fun! Think of it as “creative context.” 2) a] Recent dictionary additions to definitions include a date of first use, if known; b] words in small caps indicate “see also.” 3) Neither I (LinDee Rochelle) nor Penchant for Penning are responsible for how you use information found here, that may result in legal action.

E-N-Dzzzzzzzz